Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Author: tibf

August undefined, 2024

WebApr 13, 2024 · The Supreme Court in this case was considering whether the appellant was liable for penalty u/s 271C even though there was mere delay in payment as the … WebNote : No penalty is imposable for any failure under sections 271 (1) ( b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA, 271BB, 271C, 271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FAB , 271FB, 271G, 271GA , 271GB , 271H, 271-I , 272A (1) ( c) or ( d ), 272A (2), 272AA (1), 272B, 272BB (1), 272BB (1A), 272BBB (1), 273 (1) (b), 273 (2) (b) and 273 (2) (c) if the person or …

No penalty shall be leviable under section 271C of IT Act for mere ...

WebApr 10, 2024 · The Hon’ble Supreme Court opined that on true interpretation of Section 271C, there shall not be any penalty u/s 271C on mere delay in remittance of the TDS after … WebSection 271C (1): (a) deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B; or. (b) pay the whole or any part of the tax as required by or … philippine drug laws and standards

Penalties and Prosecutions

WebApr 12, 2024 · Supreme Court Held. The Supreme Court held that section 271C (1) (a) is applicable in case of a failure on the part of the assessee to “deduct” the whole or any part … WebNov 11, 2014 · However, the AO did not find merit in the submissions of the assessee and levied penalty U/S 271C of the Act vide order dt. 18th Aug., 2010. Being aggrieved, the … WebSection 271C of Income Tax Act deals with penalty for failure to deduct TDS or remit TDS with the Income Tax Department. The maximum amount of penalty under Section 271C is … trumm home medical alexandria minnesota

No Section 271C Penalty on mere belated TDS …

Section 271C Penalty for failure / non-deduction / non-payment of TDS

WebApr 11, 2024 · Further, penalty proceedings were also initiated u/s 271C of the Act i.e. penalty for failure to deduct tax at source and subsequently order was passed levying a penalty equivalent to the amount of TDS. Aggrieved by such penalty order, the Assessee preferred an appeal before CIT (A) however, the same was dismissed by CIT (A). WebAug 3, 2024 · The plain reading of section 271 (1) (c) of Income Tax act 1961 clearly states as follows “Concealment of particulars of income or fringe benefits or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or fringe benefits” and levies penalty of minimum 100% as a fine and maximum 300% of tax sought to be evaded in addition to tax payable. trum mike flynn cabinet positionWebMar 24, 2009 · In fact in the orders passed u/s. 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, they have been mentioning “Initiate Penalty proceedings u/s. 271 (1) (C) of the I T Act” by default on additions/disallowances done without providing any reasons irrespective of whether the assessee really tried to conceal his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of his … philippine drug enforcement agency head

"WebApr 12, 2024 · On 02.06.2003, Income Tax Officer (ITO) vide order under Section 201 (1A) of the Act, 1961 levied penal interest of Rs. 4,97,920/ for the period of delay in remittance of … " - Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Income tax penalty u/s 271c

Mere delay in remittance of TDS doesn’t attract penalty u/s 271C …

WebIncome Tax Penalty u/s 271C - failure on the part of the assessee to deduct tax at source - without declaring the assessee as assessee in default under section 201(1) no penalty … WebApr 10, 2024 · On 02.06.2003, Income Tax Officer (ITO) vide order under Section 201(1A) of the Act, 1961 levied penal interest of Rs. 4,97,920/for the period of delay in remittance of …

Did you know?

WebSep 7, 2024 · Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) Query asked by ANKUR AGRAWAL Post a comment 1.Assessment was completed u/s 143 (3)/147 making additions on account of discrepancies found in survey on account of Cash in hand and Stock in trade etc. 2.On appeal the additions made by A.O. were confirmed by CIT (A) vide order dated 06/02/2024 … WebApr 10, 2024 · The Supreme Court Monday held that no penalty shall be leviable under section 271C of the Income Tax Act over mere belated remittance of the tax deducted at …

WebApr 11, 2013 · Section 271C. If any person fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B then, such person shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to the amount of tax which such person failed to deduct or pay as aforesaid.This penalty is imposable by Joint Commissioner. Web271C: Failure to deduct tax at source, wholly or partly, under sections 192 to 196D (Chapter XVII-B) or failure to pay wholly or partly tax u/s 115-O(2) or proviso to section 194B: …

WebC.Penalty for failure to collect tax at source u/s 271CA Failure to collect the whole or any part of the tax under the provisions of Chapter XVIIBB. Penalty of the sum equal to the amount of tax which was failed to be collected shall be payable . Any penalty imposable under sub-section (1) shall be imposed by the Joint Commissioner. CA Anil Sathe WebApr 15, 2024 · The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS) after the same has been deducted by the assessee. The bench of Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar observed that the relevant words used in Section

WebApr 12, 2024 · The Supreme Court (SC) of India has held that mere belated TDS remittance won’t attract a penalty under section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. M/s US …

The penalty under section 271C is applicable under the following conditions – 1. The person fails to deduct, the whole or part of, tax at source (i.e. TDS). 2. The person fails to pay, the whole or part of, Dividend Distribution … See more In case of default, the penalty under section 271Cis leviable to the extent of an amount equal to TDS not deducted / not paid. See more Q 1. What is Chapter XVIIB? Ans:Chapter XVII of the Income Tax Act covers provisions relating to ‘Collection and recovery of tax’. Part B of Chapter XVII (i.e. Chapter XVIIB) covers … See more trummis tonyWebIncome Tax Levy of penalty u/s 271C - delay in deposit of Tax deducted at source (TDS) - Section 271C(1)(a) shall be applicable in case of a failure on the part of the concerned … philippine drug price reference index 2022WebPenalty u/s 271C - failure on the part of the assessee to deduct tax at source - without declaring the assessee as assessee in default under section 201 (1) no penalty under section 271C of the Act can be imposed View Source ← Previous Next → F: Transporter issuing builty required to take gst registration? philippine drug war effectivenessWebApr 12, 2024 · Supreme Court Held. The Supreme Court held that section 271C (1) (a) is applicable in case of a failure on the part of the assessee to “deduct” the whole or any part of the tax as required under the provisions of the Act. The words used in Section 271C (1) (a) are very clear, and the relevant words used are “fails to deduct.”. philippine drug war death tollWebApr 11, 2024 · 11 April 2024 3:15 AM GMT. The Supreme Court has ruled that no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on mere delay in remittance of … philippine dswdWeb3 hours ago · 6. Thus, from the above, it is evident that non-specification of the limb of the notice would render the penalty proceedings invalid. Accordingly, respectfully following the precedent, we set-aside the orders of the authorities below holding that notice u/s 271 (1) (c) is omnibus notice, thus defective which goes to the root of the matter. trummie patrick roswell gaWebApr 10, 2024 · The Supreme Court Monday held that no penalty shall be leviable under section 271C of the Income Tax Act over mere belated remittance of the tax deducted at source (TDS) after its deduction by the ... philippine dual citizenship application fee